tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post8401066025895657819..comments2023-11-04T17:57:14.675-06:00Comments on Asleep No More: Emergent Monday: Pseudochristianity teaming up with Pseudoscience Doug Evanshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05318930961031654937noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-31628383240709953222015-11-24T10:23:37.334-07:002015-11-24T10:23:37.334-07:00Look at the data? The data has been corrupted and ...Look at the data? The data has been corrupted and falsified<br /><br />"Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed." <br /><br />"Thus the issue of man-made global warming has taken on a whole new meaning: Yes, it is always man-made if the data are adjusted to fit the theory. The meticulous work by Ewert has predecessors, and fits a series of scandals and contradictions that are simply being ignored by the political supporters of man-made climate change.”<br /><br />In fact since 1940 the earth has been cooling<br /><br />"Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.” <br /><br />http://notrickszone.com/2015/11/20/german-professor-examines-nasa-giss-temperature-datasets-finds-they-have-been-massively-altered/#sthash.T2WsYsgO.dpufDoug Evanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05318930961031654937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-2716936192015587462015-11-20T08:32:56.151-07:002015-11-20T08:32:56.151-07:00MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: ‘Demoni...MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: ‘Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.’ – ‘When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.’Doug Evanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05318930961031654937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-82653481464167367212015-11-19T15:00:34.532-07:002015-11-19T15:00:34.532-07:00There is neither "global cooling" or &qu...There is neither "global cooling" or "global warming" which is any different than any time in history. Throughout the thousands of years of history there have been warming and cooling cycles which have not been caused by anything man has done, and these cycles will continue without any cause by man.<br /><br />This is the fact of the matter.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-77841465655880378502015-11-19T11:59:18.823-07:002015-11-19T11:59:18.823-07:00I also want to say, that if indeed your worry is g...I also want to say, that if indeed your worry is global cooling, you have to look at the data.<br /><br />Indeed there is a pattern in solar activity, this has been established by ice-core samples:<br /><br />http://www.daviesand.com/Choices/Precautionary_Planning/New_Data/IceCores1.gif<br /><br />It is easy to correlate temperature to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, so notice how the amount of CO2 has been fluctuating between 180 and 300 ppmv.<br /><br />Anybody can measure carbon concentrations, and the current estimates are around 398ppmv<br /><br />This is close to 30% higher than the highest ever recorded CO2 concentration for hundreds of thousands of years.<br /><br />http://www.ems.psu.edu/~radovic/COxTask3A.html<br />http://co2now.org/<br /><br /><br />I pray that you take a closer look at the data. I feel you are trying to do the right thing for the right reasons, and if you have any questions I will be happy to assist.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18397853916634590728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-31276419461345063942015-11-19T11:48:23.754-07:002015-11-19T11:48:23.754-07:00The RATE at which the eastern side of the Antartic...The RATE at which the eastern side of the Antartic ice sheet is growing is indeed increasing. Why? because there is more moisture in the air and the temperature differences between night and day, and the Earth's rotation angle helps deposit more snow on the ground.<br /><br />Low temperatures ALONE do not cause more ice to fall. Some of the coldest places in Earth have ZERO ice, because they are extremely dry.<br /><br />The only time that temperature will prevent ice formation is when nowhere in the planet the temperature falls under zero degrees Celsius. If that happens, then we are irrevocably screwed.<br /><br />There has been no increase in the number of hurricanes? You should probably simply go to NOAA and do a little research, it is really not that hard.<br /><br />http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/historical-atlantic-hurricane-and-tropical-storm-records<br /><br />I personally do not understand why people are against reducing carbon emissions. Moving to clean energy will help us generate more jobs, reduce our dependency of resources, and save ecosystems.<br /><br />How do we know there is more CO2 in the atmosphere? because the PH of the ocean is changing, and it is killing coral reefs that have taken centuries to form. The evidence is impossible to ignore. I want to know what do we gain by doing nothing? This seems like a pure political play. If liberals say climate change is real, conservatives must say the opposite? Even when it is true? Please help me understand.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18397853916634590728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-38240642510211198872015-11-17T06:59:14.329-07:002015-11-17T06:59:14.329-07:00Fixed! Thank youFixed! Thank youDoug Evanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05318930961031654937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-53261478790002493882015-11-17T06:02:03.795-07:002015-11-17T06:02:03.795-07:00Oh, check your spelling on your title - needs an &...Oh, check your spelling on your title - needs an "e" in Psudo.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2246295430976433070.post-70894734898792099112015-11-17T06:01:34.604-07:002015-11-17T06:01:34.604-07:00"Pseudochristianity" sums up "Rev&q..."Pseudochristianity" sums up "Rev" Currie's beliefs quite nicely.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.com